Skip to main content

    Generative AI in Marketing: Practical Use Cases

    Written by

    Jakub Cambor

    Written from AfM's working notes and the public sources listed at the end. Examples marked illustrative are hypothetical, not client results.

    This version

    Updated 27 September 2026

    3 sources cited.

    First published 20 February 2026

    Strategy

    AfM guide

    Operating model, implementation sequence, and decision quality.

    What generative AI is good at in marketing

    Generative AI produces new text, images, audio or video from an instruction and examples. In marketing that makes it good at five kinds of work:

    • • Drafting: a first version of something a person will finish.
    • • Varying: many versions of one idea for testing or for different channels.
    • • Summarising: long material turned into short, usable notes.
    • • Restructuring: the same content reshaped into a new format.
    • • Synthesising: patterns found across many inputs, such as reviews or survey answers.

    It is weak at knowing facts about your business it has not been told, judging what matters commercially, and knowing when it is wrong. Every practical use case pairs its strength with a person covering its weakness.

    Twelve use cases, with their checks

    Generative AI use cases in marketing

    Use caseWhat AI doesWhat a person checksRisk
    Summarising customer reviewsGroups praise and complaints, counts themes, pulls quotesSpot check quotes against source; decide what to act onLow
    Research synthesisOrganises competitor ads, search queries or survey answersNothing invented; conclusions justifiedLow
    Content briefsDrafts a brief from queries, audience notes and goalsAngle and prioritiesLow
    Meeting and call notesSummarises sales or customer calls into objections and languageAccuracy of summary; personal data handlingLow to medium
    Ad copy variationsProduces headline and description options within limitsClaims, policy, brand voiceMedium
    Email draftsDrafts campaign and nurture emailsFacts, offers, tone, complianceMedium
    Social post adaptationTurns one message into platform specific versionsTone per platform; no overclaimingMedium
    Blog and article draftsDrafts from a brief and sourcesAccuracy, originality, usefulness, sourcesMedium
    Product descriptionsDrafts from product dataEvery specification and claimMedium
    Video scriptsDrafts hooks, scenes and captionsClaims, brand fit, feasibilityMedium
    Images and graphicsGenerates or edits visualsDoes not misrepresent the product or people; rightsHigh
    Personalised messages at scaleTailors messages to segments or individualsData use is lawful; no errors at volumeHigh

    Why images and claims need the closest checks

    The UK advertising regulator's position is that ads made with AI are held to the same rules as any other ad, and that a disclosure saying AI was used is very unlikely to fix a misleading impression. The ASA gives the example of an AI generated image showing a cosmetic effect the product does not produce. Any image that shows your product, results or customers should be checked for whether it represents reality.

    Claims have the same issue in text form. A model asked for benefits will produce plausible ones. Keep an approved list of claims, with sources, and treat anything outside it as unverified until a person checks it.

    What Google says about AI generated content

    For content published on your site, Google's guidance is that it rewards original, helpful content that shows experience, expertise, authoritativeness and trustworthiness, however it is produced. It also says that using automation, including AI, to generate content primarily to manipulate search rankings breaches its spam policies. The practical consequence: AI can help you produce useful pages faster, and it can also help you produce unhelpful pages faster. The standard is usefulness to the reader.

    Personal data and generative AI

    Several use cases involve personal data: call notes, personalised messages, review analysis where reviewers are identifiable. The UK GDPR applies. The ICO's guidance on AI and data protection covers lawfulness, fairness, transparency and data minimisation in AI use. Practically: check what your AI provider does with inputs, do not paste customer personal data into consumer tools, and use aggregated or anonymised data where you can.

    A four week adoption plan

    1. • Week 1: pick two low risk uses (review summaries and content briefs, for example). Name a reviewer for each. Write a one page brief about your business for every prompt to include.
    2. • Week 2: run them on real work. Record for each output whether it was used as is, used with edits or discarded.
    3. • Week 3: add one medium risk, customer facing use (email drafts or ad variations) with review before anything goes out.
    4. • Week 4: compare time spent and quality against before. Keep what earned its place; drop what did not.

    Worked example: a content brief from search data

    Illustrative example for a hypothetical accountancy firm.

    • • Input: 40 Search Console queries the firm's "sole trader accounts" page appears for, the firm's business brief, and three competitor page headings.
    • • Instruction: "Group these queries by what the searcher wants to know. Identify which groups the page does not answer. Draft a brief for an improved page: audience, questions to answer in order, proof to include from the business brief only, and a suggested title."
    • • Output: five query groups, two of which (deadlines and what records to keep) the page does not cover; a brief with seven questions in order.
    • • Check: the reviewer confirms the query grouping is sensible, adds a point about Making Tax Digital that the AI had not raised, and removes a suggested claim about "fastest turnaround" that is not in the approved proof.
    • • Time: the brief takes 20 minutes including review, against perhaps an hour by hand. (Illustrative.)

    The AI did the sorting; the person supplied the expertise and the honesty check.

    What generative AI will not do for you

    It will not decide your positioning, know your margins, or tell you which customers are worth acquiring. It will not notice that an offer has expired unless you tell it. And it will not take responsibility for what you publish. Those stay with people, whether in house or, in AfM's case, as part of a managed service where the founder reviews what ships.

    For the tools behind these use cases, see the AI marketing tools comparison. For writing that sounds like you, see why AI content sounds generic.

    FAQ

    Do I have to tell customers I used generative AI?

    There is no blanket UK rule requiring disclosure in ads. The ASA's test is whether leaving it out would mislead. For realistic images of people or product results, consider disclosure, but disclosure does not cure a misleading claim.

    Which use case should a small business start with?

    Summarising customer reviews or call notes into themes and language. It is internal, low risk, quick to check and often changes what you say in your marketing.

    Can generative AI write all of our blog content?

    It can draft it. Whether it should publish unedited is another matter: Google judges content on usefulness and expertise, and drafts without your knowledge and examples tend to be generic.

    How do I stop AI copy sounding like everyone else's?

    Give it your own material: real customer phrases, past writing you are proud of, specific proof and words you never use. Generic input produces generic output.

    Sources

    1. Google Search's guidance about AI-generated content, Google Search Central. Cited 27 September 2026 from a published summary; the primary page has not been re-read. Google rewards helpful content with E-E-A-T however produced; AI used primarily to manipulate rankings breaches spam policies.
    2. Disclosure of AI in advertising, ASA and CAP. Cited 27 September 2026 from a published summary; the primary page has not been re-read. No blanket requirement to disclose AI in ads; same rules apply; disclosure unlikely to cure a misleading message; cosmetic image example.
    3. Guidance on AI and data protection, Information Commissioner's Office. Cited 27 September 2026 from a published summary; the primary page has not been re-read. UK GDPR principles including fairness, transparency and data minimisation apply to AI use.

    See where AI would help your marketing first

    The free written breakdown looks at your public marketing and any figures you choose to share, and sets out what we would prioritise. No logins needed.

    Request the breakdown

    Related Articles